Hybrid NVH modeling approach: High quality of NVH results enables psychoacoustic analysis of numerical computations

Main Article Content

T. Kamper
M. Wegerhoff
H. Brücher
R. Sottek

Abstract

In the field of acoustics, the human perception of sound is often more important than the overall sound pressure level. The human perception is highly individual and is linked to how the user's expectations of the sound and the actual perceived sound match. Thus, generalization is difficult. However, psychoacoustic parameters that are developed and validated by means of jury tests are an established tool in the field of experimental measurements to quantify the human perception for specific acoustic phenomena like tonality, roughness, and loudness. Since the precision of numerical simulations results is continuously improving, these psychoacoustics parameters can be applied as well to the results of numerical simulation.


In this Paper, the advantages of this approach are shown using the example of a numerical model of an e-bike. E-bikes have become increasingly popular in recent years, used for commuting, transporting loads or, in the case of e-mountain bikes, just for fun. As already mentioned, the acceptance of a sound is strongly linked to the expectations of the user. Since the electric drive unit of an e-bike is added to an acoustically known system, the user expects the sound to be quiet rather than dominant.


Different e-bike analyses are presented using numerical and experimental methods. The numerical model used in this project predicts the sound generated by the electrical drive unit and radiated by the frame. For the calculation of airborne noise the distribution of velocities on the surface of the frame is used as an input, which is taken from a previous simulation of structure-borne noise. The model to simulate the structure-borne noise consists of a detailed representation of the carbon frame and simplified representations of different components such as battery, fork etc. With the help of the numerical model, different combinations of frame and electrical drive can be analyzed and compared by psychoacoustic parameters. The validity of the approach is shown by means of data from experimental measurements.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hybrid NVH modeling approach: High quality of NVH results enables psychoacoustic analysis of numerical computations. (2023). Engineering Modelling, Analysis and Simulation, 1. https://doi.org/10.59972/pvt6hrtg
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Hybrid NVH modeling approach: High quality of NVH results enables psychoacoustic analysis of numerical computations. (2023). Engineering Modelling, Analysis and Simulation, 1. https://doi.org/10.59972/pvt6hrtg

References

M. Wegerhoff, B. Philippen, U. Ammerahl, and R. Sottek, “From simulation to auralization and human sound perception: A push button solution?”, Keynote speech presented at International Conference and Exhibition Automotive NVH Comfort Le Mans 2021, Le Mans, Oct. 2021.

T. P. Research, “Good sounds. Bad sounds.,” Trek Blog|Trek Bikes, Jul. 11, 2022. https://blog.trekbikes.com/en/2022/07/12/fuel_exe_bicycle_acoustics/ (accessed Feb. 07, 2023).

A. Elliott and A. T. Moorhouse, “Characterisation of structure borne sound sources from measurement in‐situ,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 3176–3176, May 2008, doi: 10.1121/1.2933261.

M. Wegerhoff, T. Kamper, H. Brücher, and R. Sottek, “Hybrid NVH modeling approach: How numerical and experimental methods complement each other”, Engineering Modelling, Analysis and Simulation, vol. 1, Jan. 2024.

ECMA-418-2, “Psychoacoustic Metrics for ITT Equipment – Part 2: Models based on human perception, 2nd edition”, 2022.

H. Fastl, and E. Zwicker, “Psychoacoustics: facts and models”, Vol. 22, Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.

R. Sottek, “Modelle zur Signalverarbeitung im menschlichen Gehör“, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1993.

R. Sottek, “A Hearing Model Approach to Time-Varying Loudness”, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 725-744, 2016.

J. Becker, and R. Sottek, “Psychoacoustic Tonality Analysis”, Proc. Inter-Noise 2018, Chicago, 2018.

R. Sottek, J. Becker, and T. Lobato, “Progress in Roughness Calculation”, Proc. Inter-Noise 2020, Seoul, 2020.

Hexagon AB, “MSC Nastran”, 2022.3, Stockholm, https://hexagon.com/de/products/product-groups/computer-aided-engineering-software/msc-nastran

Hexagon AB, “Actran”, 2022, Stockholm, https://hexagon.com/de/products/product-groups/computer-aided-engineering-software/actran

HEAD acoustics GmbH, “ArtemiS SUITE”, 14.2, Aachen, https://www.head-acoustics.com/de/produkte/analyse-software/artemis-suite